Tuesday, October 25, 2022

Team Anonymous Questionnaire

Below are the anonymous questionnaire answers from the bus ride to Kalamazoo:

A few things stood out to me:

  • Teammates are respectful of each other. 3.89 out of 5. --- If we cant respect and trust each other, things will fall apart when the going gets tough. 
  • There is another level we need to get to if we want to win Championships. 4.74 out of 5. --- Everyone understands that we have to get closer, better, smarter, and faster if we want to be the last team standing in the state. That requires discipline, dedication, and receptiveness to coaching. Raise our standard
  • Teammates take time to work on their skills outside practice. 3.34 out of 5. --- If we don't put in the work, don't expect different results. 

Strongly disagree = 1, Strongly agree = 5

1.      Teammates work hard in practice – 3.95

2.      Teammates are respectful of each other – 3.89

3.      Teammates take time outside of practice to work on their skills – 3.34

4.      Coaches run well prepared practices – 4.74

5.      I feel comfortable talking to my coaches – 4.65

6.      This team can win a Kennedy Cup – 4.87

7.      This team can win a State Championship – 4.61

8.      Varsity Team socializes outside of the rink – 4.20

9.      The coaches are fair – 4.57

1     Our Team has a meaningful, shared purpose – 4.48

11   I am proud to be a member of the Varsity Wolfpack Team – 4.96

12  There is another level we have to get to if we want to win championships – 4.74

13  My parents give me hockey advice – 3.09

14  I love hockey – 4.96

15  I want to play hockey after high school – 4.09

      




 

Thursday, September 29, 2022

Great Teammates

 Came across this great clip of Yankees Manager Aaron Boone talking about Judge as a teammate: 




Then here is Don Granato talking about supporting each other, eliminating jealousy, playing for each other. This is all tied into the cohesiveness we want to achieve.  


Bottom line. Everything we do, we do together: win, lose, compete, suffer, battle, support, achieve. A rising tide lifts all ships. Looking forward to the weekend!


-Spence 

Thursday, January 3, 2019

2019 Motivation

Boys,

Great weekend in DC. Looking back, very proud of what our group accomplished during our time there. We played some great competition and had a very impressive showing. As we go into 2019, I want you to hear this message from Admiral William McRaven:

We have the opportunity to do great things on and off the ice this year as many of you go off to college. Keep his message in mind as we go into practice this week.

  1. If you can’t do the little tasks right, you’ll never be able to accomplish the big ones
  2. The world is full of sharks.  If you want to change the world, don’t back down from them
  3. Nothing matters, but your WILL to succeed
  4. One person can change the world by giving people HOPE
  5. Take risks

About Admiral William McRaven:
Admiral William H. McRaven is a retired U.S. Navy Four-Star admiral (you may have heard of him or heard him speak). During his time in the military, he commanded special operations forces at every level, eventually taking charge of the U.S. Special Operations Command. His career included combat during Desert Storm and both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. He commanded the troops that captured Saddam Hussein and rescued Captain Phillips. McRaven is also credited with developing the plan and leading the Osama bin Laden mission in 2011. 
He has been recognized for his leadership numerous times.  In 2011, he was the first runner-up for TIME magazine’s “Person of the Year.” In 2012, Foreign Policy magazine named McRaven one of the nation’s “Top 10 Foreign Policy Experts.” In 2014, Politico magazine named McRaven one of the “Politico 50,” citing his leadership as instrumental in cutting though Washington bureaucracy. In 2015, he received the Intrepid Freedom Award for his distinguished service in defending the values of democracy. In 2016, McRaven was named the recipient of the Ambassador Richard M. Helms Award by the CIA Officers’ Memorial Foundation.  

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

How we can Improve PK Faceoff Clears

Dellow: A breakdown of the tiny edges teams create to improve zone clearances while shorthanded

By Tyler Dellow Dec 17, 2018  
At​ the risk of treading on​ Colleague​ Bourne’s​ turf​ a little​ bit,​ I​ was​ watching the Stars-Ducks game​ last​ Wednesday​​ night and observed something that prompted me to write a bit of a Systems Analystesque piece. Late in the second period, the Stars took a penalty. Watch Blake Comeau here. He’s number 15, the right wing as the puck is dropped.



See how neat and tidy that was? As the puck came back to the left corner, Comeau sprinted to the right corner to give Roman Polak an outlet. You can actually see Polak shoulder check to make sure Comeau’s on his way as he heads back for the puck. Instead of a puck that gets rimmed and easily stopped at the blueline, it’s an easy clear for Comeau. By the time the Stars get back into the offensive zone, 33 seconds of power-play time has elapsed.
Let’s do a little bit of background here. NHL teams have special teams meetings in the hours leading up to the game. The penalty killing unit will discuss what they can expect from the opposition power play. The power play units will be told how they’re going to approach things like faceoffs and breakouts, which are more readily changed than what happens once the team has a setup in the offensive zone.


In the sequence above, the Ducks had three forwards up for the faceoff and two players on the blueline. In circumstances like that, it’s harder to just rim the puck out of the defensive zone – there will be someone well positioned to come across and cut it off. Here’s a different setup, from the Oilers-Penguins game earlier this year. You can see that Edmonton has four players pushed up – Milan Lucic isn’t quite visible on the right wing but you can see Ryan Nugent-Hopkins positioned right at the top of the circle, while Oscar Klefbom is the lone man back.




The Oilers lose the draw and there’s only one man, Oscar Klefbom, on the blueline. He’s got a lot of ice to cover on a puck that’s being rimmed out, particularly if the faceoff is lost cleanly, as it was here. The Oilers were, at the time, employing an all left-shot power play, which impacted Klefbom’s positioning too.
Here’s another example of Edmonton’s setup, this time on a faceoff win. It makes it easier to see how far to the left Klefbom is.




Why push four players forwards sometimes? Well, if you lose the draw, or it’s scrambled, you’ve got an extra body who can get into the action quickly, something that’s apparent on that clip from the Oilers-Penguins game. In the first clip, Edmonton loses the faceoff and then basically blitzes. You can see where that would be an advantage if it was won less cleanly or bobbled by the defenceman. It also, as you can see in the second clip, makes it easier to establish clean control of the puck before the defending team has time to start pressuring. McDavid throws a bit of a pick but Nugent-Hopkins and Klefbom have acres of room because Nugent-Hopkins recovers the puck long before it gets to the blueline.
Note as well that when a team has four players pushed up, as the Oilers do in these clips, that the defenceman’s positioning can change based on where the faceoff is likely to be won. Klefbom is set up closer to the middle of the ice in the first clip – Draisaitl is going to try and win the puck back to him, which means pulling it into the middle of the ice. In the Blackhawks clip, the faceoff’s on the other side of the ice, which means that Klefbom is positioned closer to the boards.
Different opposition setups present different challenges. If the Stars tried to use the same set up against Edmonton that they used versus Anaheim, there’s a much greater chance that a forechecker would get them due to how the Oilers are positioned and the roles of those players. Moreover, it would be unnecessary, particularly if the faceoff’s on the left side of the ice. There’s just too much space for the defenceman to cover to cut off a rimmed puck.
This is the sort of stuff that would be covered off in a penalty kill meeting, letting those players know what they can expect. A smart team would change their approach if playing a team that was going to forecheck more aggressively and give them the rim out of the defensive zone. Here’s another Stars example, again with Polak and Comeau on the ice. This time they’re facing Edmonton’s more aggressive approach.



There’s no passing it across to the far corner here. Polak just zips it around and out through the open space.
You can actually take a data-driven look at how well teams do with this. When a shorthanded team wins a defensive zone faceoff, there’s a period in the game in which very little happens in terms of shots. You can see this if we look at the shot rate in each second after a 4-on-5 defensive zone faceoff, separated into wins and losses.
(This, incidentally, is a good reason to get rid of faceoffs. Nobody comes to the rink to watch the puck get iced. Why not just give the team that was fouled the puck to start the power play? Offence is, as Hurricanes owner Tom Dundon pointed out the other day, fun. Imagine if the team on the power play was just given the puck above the circles and permitted to line up wherever they wanted, while the defending players had to stay below the dots until the puck was played. I’d rather watch, say, Nicklas Backstrom with the puck in that situation than a linesman chastising players who are trying to cheat on a faceoff and a 48 percent chance the puck goes down the ice. But I digress.)
Anyway, you can see that the effect washes out fairly quickly. After just 20 seconds, the shot rate in a given second is about the same regardless of whether a team won or lost the faceoff. Therefore, let’s take twenty seconds as a cutoff. How often are NHL teams making it twenty seconds without allowing a shot attempt after a 4-on-5 defensive zone faceoff win? If they do their job properly and clear the puck, it should be difficult to give up an attempt within 20 seconds. Since I’m trying to infer how good teams are at coming in with a plan and executing it when they win a 4-on-5 defensive zone faceoff, this is a better measurement than looking at the shot attempt rate – if a team blows a single clearance attempt and gives up four attempts in twenty seconds, that’s a distinct issue from a team that blows four clearances, giving up a single attempt each time. As ever, the red line represents the league average rate.
It’s hard to find competitive edges in the NHL. By and large, teams have been pretty similar in terms of going 20 seconds without allowing an attempt after a 4-on-5 defensive zone win. The difference between Vegas (sixth) and Winnipeg (29th) amounts to one extra defensive zone won shift in ten on which a shot attempt is allowed within 20 seconds. The Jets are on pace to win about 138 4-on-5 defensive zone faceoffs this year. You can reasonably say that the difference in how well Winnipeg gives up nothing over the next 20 seconds versus a team like Vegas will amount to about 14 extra faceoffs where an attempt is allowed within twenty seconds, given what’s happened to date. We’re not talking about huge differences for most teams. That’s kind of what coaches are after in a lot of cases though: piling up enough small edges to turn into a big edge or, alternatively, minimize a team’s chances of breaking at a critical moment.
As ever, the Senators kind of make you wince. We’ve talked about their issues after winning defensive zone faceoffs already this year and there’s an element of the Senators struggling to deal with the rush even if they do clear the puck in these situations – the “Andy’s like, ‘Oh shit'” factor as the puck goes down the ice and comes back very quickly. It really underlines the issues with Ottawa’s penalty kill though.
We opened with the Stars doing it right, so we’ll close with an example of where it didn’t work. This clip from a Flames/Stars game pre-dates the Ducks/Stars clip by a few weeks. Again we have Polak and Comeau on the ice and a team pressuring with three forwards.



The Dallas centre blocks Calgary’s centre after the draw and Polak’s partner chips the puck back to him. However, Polak doesn’t have Comeau as an outlet. Instead, Comeau is tied up with a Calgary forward. Comeau actually seems to have done a pretty good job in terms of putting Polak into a position from which he doesn’t have to rim the puck – he can take that extra step. But he fails to do so and as soon as the puck leaves his stick, Polak knows his team is in trouble. Twelve seconds after the puck is dropped, it’s in the net. The Stars end up winning in OT but it’s a point given away to a possible competitor for a playoff berth.
It’s not the biggest thing, but if you mess it up, it’ll cost you eventually. Given the way the league is now, every little edge matters. Even thinking about how you can find the extra clearances.

Thursday, December 13, 2018

The 1%

Bourne: On the early comforts of being a top prospect in the minors and how quickly that window can close

By Justin Bourne Nov 28, 2018  
In​ the Toronto Marlies weight room​ at​ what’s​ now​ the​ Coca-Cola Coliseum​ there’s​ a large​ poster on the wall​ visible​ to​​ all the players, staff and media. Its message is simple, but an important one. It explains the concept of the aggregation of marginal gains, which is a fancy way of saying “if you just do a little bit more, or a little bit less, those things compound and you’ll end up further in that direction than you’d have ever believed.”
It looks like this:
In the hyper-competitive world of pro sports, there’s basically no more relevant message. We constantly hear about guys like Patrick Marleau who’s defied the odds by being able to be healthy and still contributing in his late 30s. We also hear about how he takes care of himself, whether it be with nutrition, in the gym or with rest. Longevity and self-care tend to go hand-in-hand.
Similarly, there are no shortage of stories about players with high ceilings that flame out, much to the bewilderment of those who know how much talent they have. Sometimes it’s a lack of opportunity, sometimes it’s luck. Others … well, sometimes the player chose the wrong side of the 1 percent a little too often.
There’s an interesting phenomenon when highly touted players are drafted and end up in the minors for developmental reasons. One, they’re generally showered with praise and promise (which may or may not go to their head), but two, they’re generally allotted a crazy long leash and tons of opportunity. As most agree, they have to play and be allowed to make mistakes to learn from them, so there’s a lot of logic there.
A problem with this, though, is that some players tend to feel … let’s say overly safe, since invincible is a bit much. They can do whatever they want and their ice time doesn’t suffer. While that risky style of play can often lead to goals in their own net, armed with their own offensive production and continued playing time, they can get comfortable.
(Sidebar: You know your favourite top prospect who’s been getting benched because the coach is an idiot and not giving him a chance and if he’d only give him a chance … there’s a chance that coach is trying to combat this and get the guy to truly work, training that prospect like a puppy.)
What many prospects don’t realize, is that the moment they show up at training camp, their hourglass gets flipped, and the sands start slipping through to the other side. They don’t realize that when those grains of sand run out, the cushy gig ends and boy can it happen quickly.
Young people in general aren’t too great at planning long term. It’s tough to believe that when you’re 19-21 in the American Hockey League, that one day you won’t be the young rookie with the long leash anymore. It’s tough to see that at some point, the coddled young seed has to become a tree that bears fruit, or the organization will throw you in the compost. In turn, it’s tough to understand that that 1 percent aggregation of marginal gains matters, because things have been going well for them so far, so what’s the big deal?
Even if you’re young and having some success, putting in the work in today’s NHL is more important than ever. If you’re handed a book to read, read it. If Patrick Marleau is doing five minutes of extra cardio, join him. If you’re travelling late into the night with a game the next day, put down the phone and get some sleep.
On Tuesday, the Toronto Marlies traded Andrew Nielsen to the Calgary Flames organization for Morgan Klimchuk. What I don’t want, is for everything I wrote above to be ascribed to Nielsen, as those are generalizations. But since he’s obviously the catalyst for this piece, some of those notes do apply.
As a rookie, the Leafs could not have been more excited to have Nielsen. He’s a 6’4” left shot D-man, has a bomb of a shot and had/has (depending on where you sit) a ceiling that seemed/seems extremely high. With that, he was given ample opportunity, including PP1 time, which led to him scoring 39 points from the back end as a rookie, which looked really, really good.
Only, he didn’t.
His speed was far below the AHL level, which is a limitation nearly impossible to overcome. He made some poor decisions, seemed hesitant to put himself in situations where he could look bad (which means sagging gaps) and just generally had a hard time. Until the power play, when he’d go bomb another one in the net.
Nielsen is a nice guy who treats those around him well. But I do get the sense that that top-end prospect entitlement pulled him away from putting in that 1 percent that makes the difference and that’s part of the reason it didn’t pan out for him in Toronto.
When I was the video coach for the Marlies, I’d have all the players shifts loaded onto iPads for the bus after the game. The players who most frequently came to me to see how they played: Connor Brown, Zach Hyman, Travis Dermott and Nikita Soshnikov. That’s one of those 1 percent things – while other guys are playing cards, they were watching the game again. Who knows how much of a difference it made. But coincidentally, things sure panned out OK for those guys.
When that hourglass gets flipped on those unassuming top prospects, and they’re trying to get better and get familiar with the pro game, a harsh reality looms. That if they don’t become the tree that quickly bears fruit, the team gets to draft seven new players the upcoming summer. And guess what? One of them is going to be a shiny new seed to be coddled, who might just play the same position, who might just bump them out of their cushy role, forcing themto swim upstream.
If you don’t put in that 1 percent, get better, and you don’t take noticeable strides, the next year you can find yourself on PP2, with a worse D-partner, and with worse numbers and ice time really fast. That’s a scary thing with all professional sports – someone is always coming for your job, and the window in which anything is handed to you and not earned is really short.
The Marlies have talented, young offensive D in Timothy Liljgren and Rasmus Sandin, they have proven vets, most of whom could handle NHL minutes, and just like that, Nielsen became expendable.
He didn’t do anything wrong necessarily. It’s a tough business, and the reality is, you have to be better than the guy next to you, and better than them fast. The AHL is only a developmental league insofar as you’re among the most valuable assets worth developing, and after that you’re in for an uphill climb.
The Marlies don’t have that poster up to decorate the walls. In that league, you’re climbing all over one another trying to get to the top, trying to be the person who gets to slap an extra “0” on their paycheck and sleep at the Ritz instead of the HoJo.
Nielsen is a talented guy who could certainly take the trade as a wake-up call and use the fresh start to push himself closer to the NHL. But to me, he’s a great lesson for all young players who have been given multiple chances in the American League. The next guy is coming along faster than most realize. That 1 percent – whether that means more time in the gym, more time after practice, or passing on fast food for some bland ol’ chicken breast – it adds up.
(Top photo: Graig Abel/Getty Images)

Wednesday, November 28, 2018

PP Effort and Responsibility

Loved this article by Justin Bourne. Unacceptable:

Systems Analyst: The calamitous effort that led to the Coyotes embarrassing shorthanded goal against

By Justin Bourne Nov 26, 2018  
The​ criteria most clubs use when deciding​ which​ players​ are​ chosen​ to​ skate​ on​ their power play is​ pretty​ standard.​​ First off, grab your two or three best offensive forwards and find them roles that best suit their unique skill sets. Find a D-man with offensive talent, who you also trust to defend at least a little. After all, anytime you have all your offence-first guys out there, there’s going to be some breakdowns. Then you dangle the remaining spots – a solid handful between PP1 and PP2 – to the rest of the team, preach that “power-play time is earned not given and whoever shows us they deserve it, will get it.”
Obviously this is a generalization – some teams just happen to be so stacked there’s no room for the less skilled players to earn a spot, while the opposite exists as well.
But the thread that binds all these different groupings is the theme from coaches that “just because you’re on the power play doesn’t mean you get to relax.” (It’s a lie – the stars can – but you get the idea.) You’re asked to battle just as hard as ever on rebounds and puck recoveries, to not saunter back into your own zone if the opposing PK has the puck, or in other words: just because the power play is fun doesn’t mean you don’t have to work hard.
So much of sport takes place in the space between the ears and this is a prime example where players’ brains fail them. Too many fall victim to the idea that “we have more guys, they’ll be backing off, this should be easy, free points ahead!” The PP is a rare chance to handle the puck and make plays, so some hesitate to expend their energy worrying about defence.
All of that brings us the short-handed goal the Arizona Coyotes gave up on Sunday night to the Calgary Flames.
No, not that one.
Not that one either.
I mean, the third one, when they were down five and would’ve been expected to show some pride, to battle and push to not get embarrassed. (Random note: The Coyotes have now given up the most shorthanded goals against in the NHL with five, and somehow remain +4 in the shorthanded goals department, having scored a league-leading nine themselves.)
That phrase, by the way – “push to not get embarrassed” – is so fitting here. Many years ago, when you were down 5-0, it was expected there would be a slew of fights, as the losing team pushed to show that they cared, and if they couldn’t win, dammit, they better do something. I say that “push to not get embarrassed” is fitting here, because that was certainly not what the Coyotes players chose to do. I’m not sure I’ve seen a more embarrassing goal against since the Leafs did this a few years back (Jordan Staal scores seconds later on a pass out front):
Or maybe since the Sabres defended like this, which as I’ve mentioned before, is actually The Pinwheel from the movie Slap Shot.
Let’s now put on our hazmat suits, and wade into the muck of how Mark Jankowski scored his second shortie of the game despite being surrounded by a pack of Coyotes, most of whom appeared to have recently consumed prey that was comprised of 90 percent sleeping pills.

Let’s start with watching the video with some annotations, then going a bit deeper on the screenshots.
Sooo, y’know, not great, Bob.
Let’s go a little deeper now … first pause in the video:
As you can see, Richard Panik physically has a stick on Jankowski and you can also notice how far behind Clayton Keller still is. I’d love to pretend Keller should be skating hard, but there’s three teammates ahead of him, so that’s not necessary. He’s most likely thinking about where to swing when they inevitably win the puck back, provided Jankowski doesn’t score.
This would be the first instance as a coach where you wouldn’t be happy. Panik doesn’t know if his team has regained possession yet, but he’s already thinking about heading the other way. Part of the fun of the power play is having your opponent outnumbered – so, you might as well use that to your advantage to ensure you do get the puck back. At this point Panik was on the ice for under 20 seconds. No need to be conserving energy by swinging.
As for Goligoski, He’s probably at around 40 seconds into his shift, but those are power play seconds, so I doubt he’s overly gassed here. He’s just not a particularly physical player (and Jankowski is huge at 6-foot-4 and 212 pounds), which is probably why with a decent angle to the puck, and his primary job being to tie-up the Flames forward, he just kind of leans on him and hopes for the best.
The best did not happen.
The best could’ve happened, had Jakob Chychrun gone in hard to win the puck battle. He really wouldn’t have even needed to go hard – he actually had a chance to just make a play on the puck. But he chooses to … I’m gonna say … cut off Jankowski from taking the puck … farther into a less-dangerous area?  I dunno man. But Chychrun is also about 38-40 seconds into his shift so, you’re going to want more effort here.
And for our final frame, we go back to Keller, under 20 seconds into his shift, really just assuming that with two of his D-men on one opposing player the puck is going to come out at some point. At least, I assume he assumes that, cause with the puck lying there to be poked, battled for, whatever, he’s just like “Ahhh I don’t know, if I go too hard here the breakout might be more tiring.”
As you know, Jankowski rolls off Goligoski, takes it uncontested to the net and slips it five hole. I’ll refrain from going too deep on Raanta – that goaltending job is a specialty with a language only a few people speak well – but I’m not too shy to lay out my assumptions: It looks like he’s A), rightfully surprised he has to play goalie at all in this moment, given the situation. B) Worried about a short-side stuff play, and guarding against that, hugging the post. C) COME ON MAN, poke-check that guy for the love of god! Even if you don’t poke it away you take away his time and space and any shot attempt will probably deflect into your own chest.
There are certain players in hockey who are allowed to take chances, and not coincidentally, they’re the offensive types who usually end up on the power play. Those types of players occasionally assume their teammates are going to make certain plays and start planning for how to get a jump on what comes next. They also conserve energy like Erik Karlsson playing defence, so when it’s time to play offence, they can fly. Sometimes, of course, getting ahead of the play and making assumptions bites you in the butt. That’s not to absolve anyone above – I’m just saying we’re dealing with a bunch of players making assumptions that their teammates are going to get it done so they can move on to the next thing. (Of course, this is why coaches love players who “play the right way.” They may not score as much, but you can count on them to not be involved in plays like the one we’ve just discussed.)
All told, the Arizona Coyotes won two of 10 hockey games in the month of November, so excuses aside, these efforts while down 5-0 couldn’t have been too inspiring for Rick Tocchet. They’re starting to make changes, because as you can see here, sticking with the status quo isn’t gonna get the job done.

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

Marty


From his Hall of Fame Speech -

“To all the kids out there listening…

Follow your dreams.  Believe in yourself.  When it seems like all the doors are closing, look for a window and find a way in.  The reason that some people don’t reach their full potential is because they quit too soon.  And most importantly, be a good teammate both on the ice and in life.”

-Marty St. Louis




Last video is long but has some amazing insight from the hall of famer:



Monday, November 5, 2018

Defense and Goalie Communication - Taking our game to the next level

D-Men/Goalies, 

Two weeks ago at practice, I asked a few of you if you had a communication system with each other. The answers varied from “kind of” to “occasionally” to “not really.” As we progress through the season and start to play better competition this will be paramount to our success in limiting preventable goals and strengthening our breakout. 

The first part of this falls on the goalies to be LOUD & CLEAR. As a goalie, you have the best view of the ice and can essentially quarterback the play. The most immediate area I see us being able to work this in is something as simple as when a power play is over. I RARELY, if ever hear a stick tap let alone an “EVEN” or “BOX" command alerting the D-Men that the PP is over.

To take this one step further, watch below on how this can be applied for a break-out:


“Hard Around” “Wheel/Skate It” “Reverse” are all simple commands that are distinguishable but make a HUGE difference in how the D approach a breakout. 

We will start to work on this in practice so we can implement it in games. 

Goalies - it’s time to find your voice and become a true 3rd defenseman. 

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

10/31 Spooky Halloween Practice

Fun Scrimmage DAY!

Flow: 10 minutes
Games: 50 minutes

Teams:

Black, Red, White
1. Coach Nick
2. Coach Spence
3. Mobarek
4. Max
4. S Doyle
6. Mathurin
7. Scherer
8. Rotunno
9. Klein
10. Fisher
11. N Mathurin
12. Ashbeck
13. OC

Gold, Gray, other colors
1. Coach Smith
2. Coach Deon
3. Mike Vilardo
4. P Doyle
5. Nelson
6. Gerami
7. Bertucci
8. Nash
9  L. Smat
10. Madura
11. Herber
12. McFarland
13. McBride


Monday, October 22, 2018

What We Need to Work On: Alumni Captain JC Connelly


I selected this video because I believe that this is a video we need to see this week with our state game coming up. At Ignatius we take great pride in our academics and our athletics is overlooked. For some reason, there is a nature at Ignatius where it is ok to be in second on the field as long as you are first in the classroom. I am sick of this environment. I am a two sport athlete and in my four years at Ignatius I have two playoff wins to show for. Two. One of them was CCHL too, yet everyone within the Ignatius environment still pats you on the back for putting forth a good effort. That is BS. I am sick and tired of settling for second. I have seen the hockey program go through one heck of a roller coaster in my four years, but never have I been apart of a team with as much opportunity as we have and we have earned it all by working our tails off every day. This team has more hunger than any other team I have been on. If you had told me that we would regularly be starting practices at 3:35 four years ago when it was ok to get on the ice at 3:52, I would have laughed, but that shows the character and hunger this team has. I don't want to be remembered as the team who had potential. I want to be remembered as the team who took Ignatius hockey to the next level. This year has been an amazing year, but its not even close to over. At the beginning of the season we joked about playing at the UC on March 17, but now it is out there for the taking and I am hungry for it and I know my brothers are too. Five. Five games until we do something that no one would have ever imagined. No one believes in us except ourselves. Now lets go out and prove everyone wrong. I want to be remembered as the team who won state as a team, not individuals. As my good friends Lilo and Stitch once said, "Ohana means family, and family means nobody gets left behind." We win State together as a brotherhood, as a family- JC Connelly March 2017